Gates Of Vienna
The noted blogger Fjordman is filing this report by way of Gates of Vienna.
Kari Vogt, historian of religion at the College of Oslo, has acknowledged that Ibn Warraq’s book “Why I’m not a Muslim” is simply as irrelevant to the examine of Islam as the Protocols of the Realized Elders of Zion are to the study of Judaism. She is widely thought-about as one of many leading professional on Islam within the country, and is ceaselessly quoted in national media on issues related to Islam and Muslim immigration. People who get most of their data from the mainstream media, which matches for the vast majority of the population, will thus be systematically fed biased data and half-truths about Islam from our universities, which have largely failed to uphold the perfect of free inquiry. Unfortunately, this case is fairly related at universities and colleges all through the West.
London’s School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), scene to a growing variety of anti-Semitic incidents from an more and more pro-Islamic campus, issued a menace to one in every of its Jewish students to cease his protests towards anti-Semitism on the University. Gavin Gross, an American, had been leading a marketing campaign in opposition to the deterioration of situations for Jewish college students at SOAS, which is a part of the University of London. SOAS had witnessed an escalation of anti-Jewish exercise, in both severity and frequency. At first of the year, the Islamic Society screened a video which in contrast Judaism with Satanism.
In the meantime, in a transfer to “promote understanding between Islam and the West,” Saudi Arabia donated about SR13 million to a leading British museum. The officials said the cash from Prince Sultan natural gas companies kentucky would pay for a brand new Saudi and Islamic gallery, which might help to painting Islamic culture and civilization in right perspectives. It will additionally help fund scholarships for Saudi students at Oxford College.
The Saudis and different oil-rich Arabs are busy buying influence over what Westerners hear about Islam. Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal bin Abdul Aziz Al-Saud, a member of the Saudi Royal Family, is a world investor at the moment ranked among the many ten richest individuals on the earth. He is thought within the USA for a $10 million examine he offered to New York Metropolis Mayor Rudolph W. Giuliani in October 2001 for the Twin Towers Fund. Mayor Giuliani returned the gift when he realized that the prince had referred to as for the United States to “re-examine its insurance policies within the Middle East and undertake a extra balanced stance towards the Palestinian cause.”
Prince Talal is also creating a Television channel, Al-Resalah, to focus on American Muslims. He already broadcasts in Saudi Arabia. In 2005, Bin Talal purchased 5.46% of voting shares in News Corp, the mother or father of Fox Information. In December 2005 he boasted to Center East Online about his skill to vary what viewers see on Fox Information. Masking the riots in France that fall, Fox ran a banner saying: “Muslim riots.” Bin Talal was not blissful. “I picked up the cellphone and called Murdoch… (and advised him) these aren’t Muslim riots, these are riots out of poverty,” he mentioned. “Within 30 minutes, the title was changed from Muslim riots to civil riots.”
A survey carried out by Cornell College found that round half of People had a unfavourable view of Islam. Addressing a press conference on the headquarters of the World Meeting of Muslim Youth (WAMY), Paul Findley, a former US Congressman, said that the cancer of anti-Muslim and anti-Islamic sentiments was spreading in American society and required corrective measures to stamp out. It was announced that the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) would be launching an enormous $50 million media campaign involving tv, radio and newspapers. “We are planning to meet Prince Alwaleed ibn Talal for his financial assist to our challenge. He has been generous up to now.”
The World Assembly of Muslim Youth, founded by the nephew of Osama Bin Laden in the US, is sharing workplaces with the Islamic Society of North America and the Islamic Centre of Canada. WAMY Canada runs a sequence of Islamic camps and pilgrimages for youth. US Special Agent Kane quoted from a publication prepared by the WAMY that said: “Hail! Hail! O Sacrificing Soldiers! To Us! To Us! So we may defend the flag on this day of Jihad, are you miserly together with your blood ! And has life develop into dearer to you And staying behind sweeter ” In keeping with him, 14- to 18-yr-olds had been the target market for these teachings.
Harvard College and Georgetown College received $20 million donations from Prince bin Talal to finance Islamic studies. “For a college with global aspirations, it is critical that Harvard have a strong program on Islam that is worldwide and interdisciplinary in scope,” stated Steven E. Hyman, Harvard’s provost. Georgetown mentioned it will use the reward – the second-largest it has ever received – to expand its Middle for Muslim-Christian Understanding. Martin Kramer, the author of “Ivory Towers on Sand: The Failure of Middle Japanese Studies in America,” said: “Prince Alwaleed is aware of that if you wish to have an impact, locations like Harvard or Georgetown, which is inside the Beltway, will make a difference.”
Georgetown professor John Esposito, founding director of the center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, has, in all probability more than some other tutorial, contributed to downplaying the Jihadist menace to the West. Kramer states that throughout his early days within the 1970s, Esposito had prepared his thesis underneath his Muslim mentor Ismail R. Faruqi, a Palestinian pan-Islamist and theorist of the “Islamization of information.” During the primary part of his profession, John L. Esposito by no means studied or taught at a serious Middle East middle. In the 80s, he revealed books reminiscent of Islam: The Straight Path, the primary of a series of favorable books on Islam. In 1993, Esposito arrived at Georgetown College, and has later claimed the standing of “authority” in the sphere.
In 2003, officials from the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) recognized Esposito as the current “Abu Taleb of Islam” and the Muslim group, not only in North America but in addition worldwide. In appreciation of his “countless effort towards dispelling myths about Muslim societies and cultures,” Dr. Sayyid Syeed, Secretary Common of the ISNA compared the position of Esposito to that of Abu Taleb, Muhammad’s non-Muslim uncle who gave unconditional assist to the Muslim group in Mecca at a time when it was nonetheless weak and vulnerable.
The rise to prominence of Esposito symbolizes the failure of vital studies of Islam – some would argue vital studies of absolutely anything non-Western – in Western Universities in the 1980s and 90s. Frenchman Olivier Roy as early as 1994 revealed a ebook entitled The Failure of Political Islam and wrote of the Center East as having entered the stage of “post-Islamism.” As Martin Kramer puts it, “the teachers had been so preoccupied with “Muslim Martin Luthers” that they never bought around to producing a single critical evaluation of bin Laden and his indictment of America. Bin Laden’s actions, statements, and videos had been an embarrassment to teachers who had assured People that “political Islam” was retreating from confrontation.
A minimum of US Universities are noticing bin Laden now. Bruce Lawrence, Duke professor of religion, has published a guide of Osama bin Laden’s speeches and writings. “If you learn him in his own phrases, he sounds like any individual who could be a really excessive-minded and welcome voice in world politics,” Lawrence said. Lawrence has additionally claimed that Jihad means “being a better pupil, a better colleague, a greater business companion. Above all, to regulate one’s anger.”
Others consider we make too much fuss about this entire Jihad enterprise. John Mueller, Professor of Political Science at Ohio State University, within the September 2006 problem of Foreign Affairs requested whether or not the terrorist menace to the USA had just been made up: “A totally credible clarification for the fact that the United States has suffered no terrorist assaults since 9/11 is that the risk posed by homegrown or imported terrorists – like that offered by Japanese Individuals during World Warfare II or by American Communists after it – has been massively exaggerated.” “The huge and expensive homeland safety apparatus erected since 9/11 may be persecuting some, spying on many, inconveniencing most, and taxing all to defend the United States against an enemy that scarcely exists.”
Lee Kaplan joined a conference of MESA, the Center East Studies Affiliation, in San Francisco: “Free copies of a glossy newsmagazine referred to as the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs have been being distributed to the lecturers in attendance. Most people, upon seeing the publication, would possibly assume it was much like Newsweek or Time.” “What most people don’t know is that the Washington Report on Center East Affairs magazine and Net site – indeed, your complete organization behind it – are funded by Saudi Arabia, a despotic regime that has been quietly buying its method onto each campus in America, notably by Middle East Research centers in the U.S.”
“I met Nabil Al-Tikriti, a professor from the College of Chicago.” “I’d invite these academic Center East scholars who truly support America’s struggle effort overseas and safety wants right here at dwelling. benzoic acid workshop People like Daniel Pipes or Martin Kramer.” I continued, “Why aren’t they here on the MESA Conference ” “They’d be shouted down,” replied Al-Tikriti.
Jihad Watch Board Vice President Hugh Fitzgerald shares his worries about MESA: “As an organization, MESA has over the previous two decades slowly however surely been taken over by apologists for Islam.” “The apologetics consists in hardly discussing Jihad, dhimmitude, or indeed even introducing the scholars to Qur’an, Hadith, and Sira.” “Books on the level of [Karen] Armstrong and Esposito are assigned, and feelgood nonsense like Maria Rosa Menocal’s The Ornament of the World.”
“No member of MESA has performed as a lot to make available to a wide public vital new work on Muhammad, on the origins of the Qur’an, and on the historical past of early Islam, as that lone wolf, Ibn Warraq. Nobody has executed such work on the establishment of the dhimmi as that lone louve, Bat Ye’or. It is an astounding situation, the place much of crucial work is just not being executed in universities, as a result of many college centers have been seized by a type of Islamintern International.”
Hugh Fitzgerald is right. The Legacy of Jihad, certainly one of the most important works on Jihad to seem in recent years, was written by Andrew Bostom, a medical doctor who was dissatisfied with a lot of the material obtainable on the topic following the terror assaults in 2001. Bat Ye’or, maybe the leading knowledgeable on the Islamic establishment of dhimmitude, is self-taught. And Ibn Warraq has written a number of excellent books on the origins of the Koran and the early days of Islamic history whereas remaining outdoors of the established College system. That is all a fantastic credit score to them personally, but it’s not a credit score to the status of Western Universities.
It is tough to understand why American or Western authorities nonetheless enable the Saudis to fund what’s being taught about Islam to future Western leaders, years after several Saudi nationals staged the worst terror assault in Western history. The United States didn’t enable Nazi Germany to buy affect at US Universities. Though the Soviet Communists had their apologists in the West in addition to paid agents, the US by no means allowed the Soviet Union to brazenly sponsor its leading schools. So why are they permitting Saudi Arabia and different Islamic nations to do so The Saudis are enemies, and needs to be banned from exerting direct influence over our Universities and major media. It’s a matter of national safety.
Still, though bribes and Saudi oil money characterize a serious obstacle to essential Western research of Islam, they do not at all make up all of the issues. Quite just a few teachers are so immersed with anti-Western ideology that they will be pleased to bash the West and applaud Islam totally free.
Few works have performed extra to corrupt essential debate of Islam in Western institutions for larger studying through the previous generation than the 1979 e book Orientalism by Edward Mentioned. It spawned a veritable military of Saidists, or Third World Mental Terrorism as Ibn Warraq places it. According to Ibn Warraq, “the latter work taught a whole era of Arabs the artwork of self-pity – “were it not for the wicked imperialists, racists and Zionists, we could be nice as soon as more” — inspired the Islamic fundamentalist era of the 1980s, and bludgeoned into silence any criticism of Islam.”
“The aggressive tone of Orientalism is what I’ve referred to as “intellectual terrorism,” since it doesn’t seek to persuade by arguments or historic analysis however by spraying expenses of racism, imperialism, Eurocentrism” one anybody who would possibly disagree. “One of his most well-liked strikes is to depict the Orient as a perpetual victim of Western imperialism, dominance and aggression. The Orient isn’t seen as an actor, an agent with free-will, or designs or ideas of its personal.”
Ibn Warraq additionally criticizes Mentioned for his lack of recognition of the tradition of vital pondering within the West. Had he delved a little bit deeper into Greek civilization and historical past, and bothered to take a look at Herodotus’ great history, Mentioned “would have encountered two options which had been additionally deep characteristics of Western civilization and which Stated is at pains to conceal and refuses to allow: the looking for after information for its personal sake.” “The Greek phrase, historia, from which we get our “history,” means “research” or “inquiry,” and Herodotus believed his work was the result of analysis: what he had seen, heard, and skim but supplemented and verified by inquiry.”
“Intellectual inquisitiveness is among the hallmarks of Western civilisation. As J.M. Roberts put it, “The huge indifference of some civilisations and their lack of curiosity about different worlds is a vast topic. Why, until very just lately, did Islamic students show no want to translate Latin or western European texts into Arabic Why when the English poet Dryden might confidently write a play focused on the succession in Delhi after the demise of the Mogul emperor Aurungzebe, is it a safe guess that no Indian writer ever thought of a play in regards to the equally dramatic politics of the English seventeenth-century court It is obvious that an evidence of European inquisitiveness and adventurousness should lie deeper than economics, necessary though they might have been.”
Martin Kramer points out the irony that novelist Salman Rushdie praised Said’s courage: “Professor Stated periodically receives threats to his safety from the Jewish Defense League in America,” stated Rushdie in 1986, “and I think it is vital for us to understand that to be a Palestinian in New York — in many ways the Palestinian — isn’t the simplest of fates.” However as it occurred, Said’s fate turned infinitely preferable to Rushdie’s, after Khomeini known as for Rushdie’s dying in 1989. It was ironic that Rushdie, a postcolonial literary lion of impeccable left-wing credentials, ought to have been made by some Muslims into the very personification of Orientalist hostility to Islam.”
In his essay The Intellectuals and Socialism, F.A. Hayek noted already many years ago that “Socialism has never and nowhere been at first a working-class motion. It is a building of theorists” and intellectuals, “the secondhand dealers in ideas.” “The typical mental need not possess particular knowledge of anything specifically, nor want he even be notably intelligent, to carry out his role as intermediary within the spreading of ideas. The category does not include only journalists, teachers, ministers, lecturers, publicists, radio commentators, writers of fiction, cartoonists, and artists.” It also “includes many skilled men and technicians, akin to scientists and docs.”
“These intellectuals are the organs which fashionable society has developed for spreading information and concepts, and it’s their convictions and opinions which function because the sieve through which all new conceptions should move before they’ll attain the plenty.”
“The most good and successful teachers are at present extra likely than not to be socialists.” According to Hayek, this isn’t because Socialists are more intelligent, however because “a a lot higher proportion of socialists among the very best minds commit themselves to these mental pursuits which in fashionable society give them a decisive affect on public opinion.” “Socialist thought owes its enchantment to the younger largely to its visionary character.” “The intellectual, by his entire disposition, is uninterested in technical details or sensible difficulties. What enchantment to him are the broad visions.”
He warns that “It could also be that as a free society as we’ve recognized it carries in itself the forces of its own destruction, that when freedom has been achieved it is taken as a right and ceases to be valued, and that the free growth of ideas which is the essence of a free society will carry about the destruction of the foundations on which it depends.” “Does this mean that freedom is valued solely when it is misplaced, that the world must in every single place go through a darkish phase of socialist totalitarianism before the forces of freedom can gather energy anew ” “If we’re to keep away from such a growth, we should be in a position to offer a brand new liberal program which appeals to the imagination. We must make the constructing of a free society as soon as more an mental adventure, a deed of courage.”
In his e book Trendy Tradition, Roger Scruton explains the continued attraction of left-wing ideology in this fashion:
“The Marxist concept is as form of financial determinism, distinguished by the idea that elementary changes in economic relations are invariably revolutionary, involving a violent overthrow of the outdated order, and a collapse of the political “super-structure” which had been constructed on it. The theory is sort of actually false: nevertheless, there’s one thing about the Marxian image which elicits, in enlightened folks, the will to imagine. By explaining tradition as a by-product of fabric forces, Marx endorses the Enlightenment view, that material forces are the one forces there are. The outdated tradition, with its gods and traditions and authorities, is made to look like an internet of illusions – ‘the opiate of the individuals,’ which quietens their distress.”
Hence, in keeping with Scruton, within the wake of the Enlightenment, “there came not only the response typified by Burke and Herder, and embellished by the romantics, but also a countervailing cynicism in the direction of the very idea of tradition. It became regular to view culture from the outside, not as a mode of thought which defines our ethical inheritance, however as an elaborate disguise, by means of which synthetic powers signify themselves as pure rights. Because of Marx, debunking theories of tradition have become part of culture. And these theories have the structure pioneered by Marx: they determine power as the fact, and culture because the mask; they also foretell some future ‘liberation’ from the lies that have been spun by our oppressors.”
It’s putting to note that this is precisely the theme of creator Dan Brown’s huge worldwide hit The Da Vinci Code from 2003, thought to be one of many ten best-promoting books of all time. Along with being a simple thriller, the novel claims that the entire fashionable history of Christianity is a conspiracy of the Church to cowl up the truth about Jesus and his marriage to Mary Magdalene.
Australian writer Keith Windschuttle, a former Marxist, is bored with that anti-Western slant that permeates academia: “For the past three many years and more, most of the main opinion makers in our universities, the media and the arts have regarded Western tradition as, at finest, one thing to be ashamed of, or at worst, something to be opposed. The scientific knowledge that the West has produced is just certainly one of many “ways of understanding.”
“Cultural relativism claims there aren’t any absolute requirements for assessing human tradition. Hence all cultures ought to be thought to be equal, although different.” “The plea for acceptance and open-mindedness doesn’t lengthen to Western culture itself, whose history is thought to be little greater than a crime in opposition to the rest of humanity. The West can not decide other cultures however must condemn its personal.”
He urges us to recollect how unique some parts of our culture are: “The ideas of free enquiry and free expression and the right to criticise entrenched beliefs are things we take a lot without any consideration they’re virtually part of the air we breathe. We need to recognise them as distinctly Western phenomena. They have been never produced by Confucian or Hindu culture.” “But without this concept, the world would not be as it’s as we speak. There would have been no Copernicus, Galileo, Newton or Darwin.”
The re-writing of Western historical past has grow to be so unhealthy that even playwright William Shakespeare has been proclaimed a closet Muslim. “Shakespeare would have delighted in Sufism,” said the Islamic scholar Martin Lings, himself a Sufi Muslim. In response to The Guardian, Lings argued that Shakespeare’s “work resembles the teachings of the Islamic Sufi sect” in the Worldwide Shakespeare Globe Fellowship Lecture at Shakespeare’s personal Globe Theatre in London. Lings spoke during Islam Consciousness Week.
“It’s not possible for Shakespeare to have been a Muslim,” David N. Beauregard, a Shakespeare scholar and coeditor of Shakespeare and the Tradition of Christianity in Early Trendy England, informed. Shakespeare “maintained Roman Catholic beliefs on crucial doctrinal variations.” Beauregard notes that “this is to not say that Shakespeare was occupied with writing religious drama, however solely that a specific religious tradition informs his work.”
According to Robert Spencer, “Shakespeare is simply the latest paradigmatic figure of Western Christian culture to be remade in a Muslim-pleasant manner.” Lately the [US] State Department asserted, with out a shred of evidence, that Christopher Columbus (who in fact praised Ferdinand and Isabella for driving the Muslims out of Spain in 1492, the same yr as his first go to to the Americas) was aided on his voyages by a Muslim navigator. “The state of American schooling is so dismal at the moment that teachers themselves are sick-geared up to counter these historic fantasies.”
The Gates of Vienna weblog quoted a report by The American Council of Trustees and Alumni (ACTA) on US Universities. Their survey revealed “a exceptional uniformity of political stance and pedagogical approach. All through the humanities and social sciences, the same points surface again and again, no matter discipline. In programs on literature, philosophy, and historical past; sociology, anthropology, and religious studies; women’s studies, American studies, [..] the main target is persistently on a set list of subjects: race, class, gender, sexuality, natural gas companies kentucky and the “social building of identity”; globalization, capitalism, and U.S. “hegemony”; the ubiquity of oppression and the destruction of the surroundings.”
“In class after class, the identical essential message is repeated, in phrases that, to a tutorial “outsider,” usually seem just about unintelligible.” “In quick, the message is that the established order, which is patriarchal, racist, hegemonic, and capitalist, should be “interrogated” and “critiqued” as a means of theorizing and facilitating a social transformation whose necessity and value are taken as a given.” “Differences between disciplines are starting to disappear. Programs in such seemingly distinct fields as literature, sociology, and women’s research, for example, have turn into mirror photographs of one another.”
Author Charlotte Allen commented on how Harvard University President Lawrence Summers brought on a storm by giving a speech speculating that innate variations between the sexes could have something to do with the truth that proportionately fewer women than males hold top positions in science. Summers in 2006 announced his intention to step down at the tip of the school yr, partially on account of pressure brought on by this speech. “Even if you’re not up on the scientific analysis – a paper Mr. Summers cited demonstrating that, while girls overall are simply as smart as males, considerably fewer ladies than men occupy the very highest intelligence brackets that produce scientific genius – widespread sense tells you that Mr. Summers has acquired to be right. Not too long ago, Harvard’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences passed a vote of no confidence in Mr. Summers. Wouldn’t it’s preferable to talk overtly about men’s and women’s strengths and weaknesses ”
Sure, Ms. Allen, it might. Summers might have been fallacious, however it’s dangerous as soon as we embark on a highway the place essential issues aren’t debated at all. One of many hallmarks of Western civilization has been our thirst for asking questions on every little thing. Political Correctness is thus anti-Western each in its form and in its intent. It should be famous that in this case, Feminists were within the vanguard of Computer, the identical ideology that has blinded our Universities to the Islamic risk.
It makes it even natural gas companies kentucky worse when we all know that other Feminists in academia are asserting that the veil, and even the burka, characterize “an different Feminism.” Dr. Wairimu Njambi is an Assistant Professor of “Women’s Studies” on the Florida Atlantic College. Much of her scholarship is devoted to advancing the notion that the cruel follow of feminine genital mutilation (FGM) is definitely a triumph for Feminism and that it is hateful to recommend otherwise. In response to Njambi “anti-FGM discourse perpetuates a colonialist assumption by universalizing a specific western picture of a ‘normal’ physique and sexuality.”
Still, there are pockets of resistance. Professor Sigurd Skirbekk on the College of Oslo questions most of the assumptions underlying Western immigration insurance policies. Certainly one of them is the notion that wealthy countries have a duty to soak up all individuals from other nations which can be suffering, both from natural disasters, political repression or overpopulation. In response to him, it cannot be thought of moral of the cultural, political and religious elites of those countries to allow their populations to grow unrestrained after which push their excess population onto different countries.
Skirbekk points out that European countries have earlier rejected the Germans once they used the argument of lebensraum as a motivation for his or her international policy. We must always do the identical thing now when different international locations invoke the argument that they lack space for his or her population. In response to him, there is loads of literature accessible concerning the ecological challenges the world can be dealing with in this century. Operating a too liberal immigration coverage while refusing to confront such unpleasant moral points is not a sustainable various in the long term. We will then only push tough dilemmas onto future generations.
In Denmark, linguist Tina Magaard concludes that Islamic texts encourage terror and combating to a far better degree than the unique texts of other religions. She has a PhD in Textual Evaluation and Intercultural Communication from the Sorbonne in Paris, and has spent three years on a research mission evaluating the original texts of ten religions. “The texts in Islam distinguish themselves from the texts of other religions by encouraging violence and aggression in opposition to folks with other religious beliefs to a bigger diploma. There are also easy calls for terror. This has long been a taboo within the research into Islam, however it is a reality we need to deal with.”
Furthermore, there are a whole bunch of calls within the Koran for fighting towards individuals of other faiths. “If it is appropriate that many Muslims view the Koran because the literal words of God, which cannot be interpreted or rephrased, then now we have an issue. It’s indisputable that the texts encourage terror and violence. Consequently, it have to be affordable to ask Muslims themselves how they relate to the text, in the event that they read it as it’s,” says Magaard.
The examples of Skirbekk, Magaard and others are certainly encouraging, but not quite a few enough to considerably change the general image of Western academics largely paralyzed by Political Correctness and anti-Western sentiments.
Author Mark Steyn comments on how “out in the true world it appears the true globalization success story of the 1990s was the export of ideology from a comparatively obscure a part of the planet to the center of every Western metropolis.” “Writing in regards to the collapse of nations comparable to Somalia, the Atlantic Monthly’s Robert D. Kaplan referred to the “citizens” of such “states” as “re-primitivized man.”
“When lifelong Torontonians are sizzling for decapitation, when Yorkshiremen born and bred and into fish ‘n’ chips and cricket and lousy English pop music self-detonate on the London Tube, it would seem that the phenomenon of “re-primitivized man” has been successfully exported around the planet. It’s reverse globalization: The pathologies of the remotest backwaters now have franchise shops in every Western metropolis.”
It is feasible to see a connection here. Whereas Multiculturalism is spreading ideological tribalism in our universities, it’s spreading physical tribalism in our main cities. Since all cultures are equal, there isn’t any have to preserve Western civilization, nor to uphold our laws.
It’s true that we may by no means fully attain the ideal of goal truth, since we’re all kind of limited in our understanding by our private experiences and our prejudice. Nonetheless, this doesn’t mean that we must always abandon the perfect. That’s what has occurred in the course of the previous decades. Our schools aren’t even making an attempt to hunt truth; they’ve determined that there is no such thing as a such factor as “truth” in the primary place, just completely different opinions and cultures, all equally valid. Besides Western tradition, which is inherently evil and needs to be damaged down and “deconstructed.” Western Universities have moved from the Age of Motive to the Age of Deconstruction.
Whereas Chinese language, Indian, Korean and other Asian Universities are graduating millions of motivated engineers and scientists yearly, Western Universities have been lowered to little hippie factories, teaching about the wickedness of the West and the blessings of barbarism. This represents a serious problem to the lengthy-time period economic competitiveness of Western nations. That’s dangerous, but it’s the least of our worries. Far worse than failing to compete with non-Muslim Asians is failing to identify the risk from Islamic nations who wish to su