small petroleum refinery for sale, project rig oil and gas ghana,Petroleum refinery MACT standard guidance,

Gasoline Prices And Deregulation: George Bush’s Legacy

HubPages»
Politics and Social Issues»
Power Issues
Fuel Costs And Deregulation: George Bush’s Legacy
Updated on February 14, 2015 bgpappa moreContact Creator Books
American Orientalism: The United States and the Center East since 1945 Buy Now Someone asked as a request whether the rise of gasoline prices is tied to a Bush being into office. The straightforward reply is yes, but not for the explanations that you’d assume.

Politics aside, there seems to be a connection with a Bush being into workplace and the rise is fuel prices. I am not, nonetheless, like so lots of my liberal buddies who consider this is due to a corrupt intention to control the gas costs by the Bush family. As an alternative, I imagine it is a change in laws.

Generally, Republicans want as little regulation as potential over American business. This can be identified as the free market strategy. The current Bush ran a deregulator believing that the market could higher regulate the economy that the government. For probably the most part, I actually imagine this is a sound contention. Nonetheless, I don’t imagine this idea works on the subject of vitality.

Within the early part of this decade, California deregulated energy. What was seen as a means to advertise competition within the marketplace grew to become an economic catastrophe. California now not had enough vitality and experienced rolling blackouts. Prices rose out of management. There was no competitors. This is due to the truth that there are only a few producers of power.

The same is true for oil. There are very few nations that may produce the amount of oil the United States uses. Granted, many countries have oil, just a few companies management its output. With out government regulation, these firms have full control over the worth.

Now I consider in alternative energy. However it’s not right here yet. Alternative energies are usually not but cost effective or possible. The Bush administration did nothing to maneuver it along and confirmed no interest to take action. This meant that the oil producers knew that there can be no regulation of fuel and no competition. This results in the value going up below any economic mannequin.

So yes, it is coincidence, however not by corruption. If President Bush had not been so anti-regulation and pro-market, the costs could have remained stable. But given the varied wars, using oil by the navy in those wars, and a complete lack of discovery on alternative fuels, the costs we paid a number of months in the past was inevitable. And now, in Bush’s final days, the costs are increased to get some final minute profits earlier than regulation returns. Hopefully, we’ll push for options as nicely. We are going to see.

Just my rant. I could also be improper.
Portraits of Courage: A Commander in Chief’s Tribute to America’s Warriors Buy Now Associated Articles

Sixty Votes
When Barack Obama was elected President in November 2008, the American folks also elected democratic majorities in the United States House of Representatives and the United States Senate. The reason for…

Jesus Killed Mohammed
In today’s era of a sensationalist media that does not inform the facts that America needs to know, however instead tries to influence what People consider are important, many stories which can be necessary to the…

Consequences And Credibility
In the course of the administration of former President George W. Bush, the United States was led into a warfare in Afghanistan. The war was a direct result of the September 11 attack on the United States by Al Queda. …

Rush To Judgment
In recent weeks, a lot debate befell over the airwaves about conservative speak present host Rush Limbaugh attempted buy of the St. Louis Rams. Limbaugh was reportedly part of a partnership group geared toward…
Associated
Power IssuesWhy Do Gas And Oil Costs Seem To Go Up And Down How Does Production Influence Gasoline Value Modifications
by Lena Welch12

Frugal LivingFinding Low cost Gas Costs within the USA
by Angela Michelle Schultz14
In style
Vitality IssuesHow Will we Conserve Natural Assets Finest Water Conservation Methods
by HollieT15

Energy IssuesEnergy Assets: Russia Joins China – The decision for Help
by ManIntheMiddle0
Energy IssuesThe Future of Coal Mining – Electricity Options
by Cynthia Sageleaf12

sendingAuthorbgpappa 5 years ago from Sacramento, California
And which “details” and “liberal counter factors” do you refer. Some specifics could be good.

Nonala Gauche 5 years in the past from Norman, Oklahoma
Jon EWall rebutted you with details and all you may do is counter with liberal speaking points.

Agreed Modern,
Both we change our methods or stop complaining I suppose. Thanks for the remark.

Moderndayslave 6 years ago
I read that a barrel of oil was traded 27 times earlier than it reached its remaining vacation spot in 08 when fuel was as much as $4 a gallon. So I suppose Wall avenue is at it again I believe if you are taking all of those fingers out of the pie oil could be about $35 a barrel. The SEC is a dog and pony present so until the final population will get off their a** nothing will change.

Authorbgpappa 6 years in the past from Sacramento, California
DJ, Bush did deregulate. Yes, Clinton bombed Iraq, however he didn’t invade the Country below false pretenses.

Thanks for stopping by.
DJ 6 years ago

bgpappa, Bush didn’t deregulate, Reagan administration did and ever administration carried on together with Clinton administration as project rig oil and gas ghana well it appears lefties neglect Clinton bombed Iraq earlier than.

Ugh, ugh, ugh,
In keeping with your interpretation, there is a distinction. For those who had the chance to catch President Obama on the campaign path the last three weeks, possibly you may clear up the spin and the lies in your readers.

I have listed them over and over again. But I by no means referred to as them “lies.” Spin, half truths, you already know, what all Washington people do. Blaiming Obama for all the things, Bush for everthing using details that don’t help your argument. Not a lie, simply spin.

Please ” let me be clear ”, be more particular as to the lies that you just declare that I have written. Do not be obscure, permit me to follow your sources,be more to the purpose if you can.

Proper. Positive.
In my hubs I solely point out the information,there may be sufficient blame to go around once we focus on our corrupt government in Washington.

See unlike you, I am capable of see some good even in these of which I disagree. Bush was nice in the weeks after 911. Confirmed great management, did loads to maneuver the nation forward mentally and emotionally. The scene at ground zero was top-of-the-line Presidential moments in our historical past for my part. Not to say that President Bush has a beautiful family, by all accounts is a great dad (something that is vital to me). I don’t want CNN or Fox to tell me these things, nor do I want talking points. Simply my opinion. Nevertheless, Bush made loads of errors, some by admission, and the lies told to go to warfare in Iraq are simply unforgiveable.

Yes, there are two sides to every coin. Its humorous that you would level that out as you never blame Republicans for anything and Democrats for all the things. As for not many individuals believing it, you need to be kidding. Maybe none of your mates, however a vast majority of the country, Bush’s approval scores had been below these of Nixon and Truman. Obama’s 42 p.c would have been a welcomed site within the Bush White Home.

I do not consider you have many people believing all that.
Bush apparently did not do much good whereas he was president.THERE Is two SIDES OF A COIN,did he do anything proper or good Let’s try to be fair and balanced for as soon as. the whole reality and nothing however the entire fact will set you free!

Um, wrote your complete hub about it. Learn it again if you need to. But the nice recession, two badly managed wars, one brought on by fraud, Katrina, deregulation, all Bush legacies.

What is the Bush legacy, are you able to reiterate for the world to see
Consider I wrote this hub earlier than Obama was sworn in, you are somewhat late to the social gathering. But is not it fascinating that you simply by no means, and i imply never, need to talk about Bush’s legacy. Based on you he has no legacy, it didn’t occur. Funny.

You requested for it
YOU DWELL Previously,That is ALL History NOW.What has Obama accomplished within the last 19 months that project rig oil and gas ghana can’t make folks overlook about Bush The tarp bailout money has been repaid with curiosity ( saved the country going over the sting ).That implies that the Bush deficit is simply $600 billion, down from $1.3 billion (tarp bailout).Barak Obama has spent 3x as a lot as Bush did and still we’ve 9.7% unemployment,14.5 million out of labor and an economic system that has but to recuperate.

We don’t even know what the 2011 funds is, guess it have to be dangerous for the Democrats and President Obama.Obama promised open and transparent authorities.The folks should be affected person,it’s exhausting work and it’ll take some time to right what the last administration left us with.

Sounded lots totally different when Barak Obama was a candidate.
I do blame Bush for far more, but this was only one example.

Thanks for reading
You requested for it 7 years ago from in between here and there

Oh, however you need to blame Bush for much more not just the value of fuel. Did he deliver any oil again from his fiasco in Iraq

P.S. Do not listen to Jon, he makes no sense; not right here and not a lot within the forums both, however he likes to talk and discuss and talk, so we let him…

I don’t assume I do spin anything, I’ll rail against a dem just as fast as a republican. Just so occurs I feel you might be fallacious on this subject. Laid out the fact, youi didn’t actually disagree, except for 2007 which I humbly admit I spaced on.

Oil firms do not pay 50 percent taxes, possibly in theory, however not in reality. And i have nothing against anybody making a revenue, however when costs are rising because of upper costs, demand is down (which it was when prices rose) and you continue to manage the most important revenue ever, then something is amiss.

By the way, there are over project rig oil and gas ghana 4000 shallow water wells on US land. Just an fascinating truth I learned from fox information today.

Thanks for the ocmment.
YOU Stated ” be aware that in March 2008, or two months after the democrats took over Congress, OPEC accused the United States of economic “mismanagement”

Be aware Democrats took over Jan 2007 as I reported. It took the dems just a bit of over 1 year to foul issues up.

you mentioned ” the profits of the six main oil companies – ExxonMobil, Total, Shell, BP, Chevron, and Conoco Phillips – totaled $494.8 billion.”

When firms make revenue, that is not dangerous because the politicians want you to imagine. The oil company income had been about 3% on their funding, that’s not out of line with trade requirements.

Now needless to say the federal government( taxpayers ) received possibly 50% of those earnings for the treasury. Question how did the federal government spend our money. If you may remember there was a call to suspend federal gasoline taxes (17% on a gal. of gasoline )when the fuel costs were $four.00/ GAL.The government Did not ACT.

The oil speculators knew that the Democrat Congress would not approve more US drilling. Excessive gasoline prices helped the ignite the recession in Nov 2008.

Google Ethanol, Corn Ethanol
Senator Majority Leader Harry Reid’s invoice, S. 1419, the “Renewable Fuels, Shopper Protection and Vitality Efficiency Act of 2007 consists of requirement to produce 36 billion gallons of biofuels by 2022, almost five times the 7.5 billion gallon ethanol mandate focused for 2012 included within the Vitality Policy Act of 2005.

Enjoyed YOUR Feedback. You are HOPEFULLY GETTING OUT OF THE SPIN Space.
Authorbgpappa 7 years in the past from Sacramento, California

Humorous, George Bush was President for eight years, yet he seems to never obtain any blame for something that happened in these eight years. But on this hub, I don’t really blame Bush for anyting apart from what his coverage was: as little regulation as doable and the oil market response to that coverage perspective. But you cannot wait to spin that in two years democrats brought about a financial disaster that started in 2006.

When Bush took workplace the value of oil was about $25 a barrell. In 2003 the worth rose above $30 after the invasion of Iraq and by 2005 the worth reached $60. Yes, the peak was in 2008, six months after the democrats reached workplace, however do you really anticipate anyone to consider that six months was the reason for the fuel disaster. The rise in fuel prices was a continuing strain on the financial system and my pocketbook once Bush reached office in 2001. Once more, this was market forces at work, some would say this was good. Unchecked market forces couples with the rise of demand as a result of waging wars and Hurricana Katrina brought about a spike. Plus, you can’t neglect the contining enhance demand from new customers like China, India and others. It will be significant to note that Between 2004 and 2007, the earnings of the six major oil firms – ExxonMobil, Whole, Shell, BP, Chevron, and ConocoPhillips – totaled $494.Eight billion.

It is also essential to note that in March 2008, or two months after the democrats took over Congress, OPEC accused the United States of financial “mismanagement” that was pushing oil costs to document highs.

I have not heard the “corn theory” earlier than but can be willing to evaluation it should you were sort enough to offer a link.

Thanks for the remark.
JON EWALL 7 years in the past from usa

bgpappa
Seems to be Such as you WROTE YOUR HUB 17 MONTHS Ago sometime in Feb.

Let’s clear up some info concerning the high worth of fuel.
2007 the Democrats took over management of Congress (spending and legislation ).Pelosi and Reid handed legislation to supply ethanol, ethanol is made from corn. Corn was taken out of the meals chain causing a world shortage of corn and better food prices.

2007 a barrel of oil was $ fifty six.00.The Dem’s shut down production of US oil by denying permits and extra regulations favoring alternate fuel production.

The sensible folks on wall street, Goldman Sachs, pension funds and other related large money speculators jacked up the oil costs from $ 56 to $125 a barrel. Lot of them and international oil producers made some huge cash. Gasoline costs sky rocketed to $4 a gal if you’ll be able to remember. Trucking value went up, meals costs went up and people and businesses began to layoff folks.

It only took 2 years of the Democrat Congress to mismanage the financial system on the expense of a lame duck president ( BUSH ).

End result of higher meals ,higher gas and other people unable to pay their mortgages led us up to the current recession.

2010 the Dem’s win the Presidency and win an excellent majority of Congress therefore the Republicans do not count in drafting laws. 2007 unemployment was four.6%, 2008 6.7% (recession started in nov 2008),2009 10+% and now in 2010 9.7%.

Let’s hope that this Congress and president Obama will lastly strive to search out the jobs that had been promised in 2008.

That is past historical past, the future is what is now necessary.
Test it, advise please if I errored.

I am glad as effectively, even written a couple of hubs on my celebration of change. One factor that is fascinating is right here in California, everytime the Lawyer Common says he is going to look into gas costs they drop by twenty % inside a week. Even the threat of regulation appears to regulate the value. My problem with President Bush’s insurance policies is that it was apparent nothing was going to be performed and “market forces” would go unchecked. Assume historical past will present that this much of a palms off approach on necessities (gasoline, food, housing, finanical) does not work.

Thanks for reading.
Joanna McKenna 8 years in the past from Central Oklahoma

Regulation will not be a foul factor. I liken it to what would occur if all traffic lights were turned off and stop signs taken down. Total chaos, in fact, where solely the biggest automobiles and most intimidating drivers would get by interesections. Pretty much what happens to the value of oil when a Repug is in workplace. Just as visitors lights and indicators keep traffic flowing smoothly, regulation of industries that serve the general public keep the monster trucks from hogging the street. We have simply seen what DEregulation did to the financial system.

Had Bush been a real president final summer, a type of govt orders he was so fond of signing could’ve have dropped gas prices *for nationwide security*. Such a weinie. So glad he is GONE!

Thanks
Lgali eight years ago

good hub
Authorbgpappa 8 years in the past from Sacramento, California

Thanks.
babyfee 8 years in the past

Its a terrific opinion.